Legal Opinion

Anaya v. Turk

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1984No. Civ. 67762PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FEINERMAN, P. J.

Plaintiff, Roberto Anaya, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendants Charles and Patricia Turk, as individuals, and doing business as Turk’s Import and Export. In his first amended complaint, plaintiff sought damages for severe personal injuries suffered when, as a social guest in defendants’ apartment, he was shot by another defendant, Stanley Wilson (Wilson). As a result of his injuries, plaintiff is now a paraplegic.

Plaintiff’s first amended complaint contained two causes of action pertaining to defendants. In the first cause of action, plaintiff alleged…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  3. Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Chern v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Castaneda v. OlsherCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Flowmaster, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance v. MarinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Bisetti v. United Refrigeration Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API