Nosler v. Coos Bay Navigation Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
From Coos. Action by J. T. Nosler, administrator of tbe estate of Matilda E. Nosler, against tbe Coos Bay, Roseburg & Eastern Railroad & Navigation Company. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, defendant appeals. A motion to strike out part of tbe record was granted and the judgment affirmed. On. rehearing the order was modified by eliminating the affirmance clause, but subsequently, on a second motion, the judgment was affirmed without an opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion- to Strike Out Part of the Transcript.
2Per curiam
This is a motion to strike from the files what purports to be a transcript of the stenographer’s notes of the proceedings had at the trial in the court below from the impaneling of the jury to the rendition of their verdict, which covers three hundred and twenty-six pages of the printed abstract, and is designated as “Transcript of Trial,” for the reason that it is not properly part of the record.
1. A transcript of the stenographer’s notes of the trial of an action at law is no part of the record on an appeal to this court, unless made so by a…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Roberts v. ParrishOregon Supreme Court · 1889
- McQuaid v. Portland & Vancouver R. R. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
- Eaton v. O. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Reynolds v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Fisher v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- Multnomah County v. Willamette Towing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. KlineOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Van De Wiele v. GarbadeOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Weinstein v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Multnomah Lumber Co. v. Toston Basket Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.