Legal Opinion

Bielaski v. Fordham Nat. Bank

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 29, 1935Published

1Opinion of the Court

RIPPEY, District Judge.

This case was brought on in regular order on the law calendar before the court and jury. At the close of the trial, each party moved for a direction of verdict in its favor. Thereupon proceedings were had whereby the parties stipulated that the jury should be discharged and the case should be decided by the court upon the law and the facts as though the case had been tried before the court without a jury. The case was accordingly submitted to the court.

The defendant, Fordham National Bank in New York, was a national banking association with offices in the borough of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Vought v. Eastern Building & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. U.S. Radiator Co. v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Buffalo Jamestown Railroad Co. v. . GiffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Grandison v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  5. Pender v. Chatham Phenix Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API