Commonwealth v. Schaeffer
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam 1
The Court being evenly divided, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.
MONTEMURO, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter. ZAPPALA, J., files an Opinion in Support of Affirmance in which FLAHERTY and CAPPY, JJ., join. NIX, C.J., files an Opinion in Support of Reversal in which LARSEN and PAPADAKOS, JJ., join. LARSEN, J., files an Opinion in Support of Reversal. PAPADAKOS, J., files an Opinion in Support of Reversal.
OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE
ZAPPALA, Justice.
The sole issue presented is whether, under the Pennsylvania Constitution, the police can…
Also in this document: Per curiam 2.
3Cases cited20 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Blystone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. O'BergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. FowlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Dunnavant, G.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. O'BergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. SelbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.