Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Platzer

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1889No. 2691PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Galveston. Tried below before Hon. W. H. Stewart.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Chief Justice.—

This action was prosecuted by appellees, to recover the value of grass and other property charged to .have been destroyed by a fire which it is alleged was caused by sparks and fire negligently permitted to escape from one of appellant’s locomotives.

It is further alleged that the servants of appellant negligently failed to.. *119extinguish the fire when it originated although they might have done so by the exercise of slight diligence.

The cause was tried before a jury and resulted in a verdict for appellees on which a judgment was entered.

Appellee’s land seems to have been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Higgins v. DeweyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  3. Kenney v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  4. Kenney v. Hann. & St. Jo. R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1876

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Turner v. Big Lake Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Cosden Oil Co. v. SidesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Klostermann v. Houston Geophysical CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. ChittimCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API