Legal Opinion

United States v. Alquzah

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided March 13, 2015No. 3:11-cr-0373-FDW-DSKPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

FRANK D. WHITNEY, Chief Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Government’s Motion to Dismiss the petition in part and for partial summary judgment (Doc. No. 549) as to properties which have been preliminarily forfeited in this case. Petitioner is Defendant’s wife. Except for Petitioner’s partial interests in two real properties located in Kentucky and in one bank account, the Government moved to dismiss her petition for lack of standing or, in the alternative, for summary judgment.

For the reasons which follow, the Government’s motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED.

I.BACKGR…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. CGM, LLC v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. All Assets Held in Account Number 80020796, in the Name of Doraville Properties Corporation, at Deutsche Bank International, Limited in Jersey, Channel Islands, and All Interest, Benefits or Assets TrDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API