Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Curnan v. . D. O.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The finding that the work was suspended in March, 1890, by direction…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. HW Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  2. Moses v. AutuonoSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  3. Chambers v. . LancasterNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. W. L. Waples Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  5. Mack v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API