Legal Opinion

Chambers v. . Lancaster

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 1899PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, the Lew York Stone Crushing Company, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 25, 1896, affirming a judgment in • favor of plaintiff ■entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.

Read the full summary

Appeal by the defendant, the Lew York Stone Crushing Company, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 25, 1896, affirming a judgment in • favor of plaintiff ■entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. This action was brought by the plaintiff, as assignee for the benefit of the creditors of Charles A. Dixon, against James H. Lancaster and the Lew York Stone Crushing Company, to recover a balance of $5,000 alleged to be due upon a contract between the company and Lancaster, whereby the latter undertook…

1Opinion of the Court

Parker, Ch. J.

A unanimous affirmance by the Appellate Division of the facts found by the trial court conclusively establishes, for the purposes of this review, that: On the 2nd day of February, 1894, the Eew York Stone Crushing Company, through its president and secretary, entered into a contract with the defendant James H. Lancaster, whereby Lancaster was to furnish certain machinery to be used in the plant of such company at Bergen county, Eew Jersey, including among other things two stone crushers, to be known respectively as numbers 6 and 8, with screen. The machinery and appliances to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Risley v. . Phenix Bank of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Brown v. . FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Curnan v. . D. O.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Rivers v. Wright & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Long Pole Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Haynes v. Kenosha Electric Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Deering v. . SchreyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Graham v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1931

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API