Stuart v. Allen
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the County Court of Mifoocmhee County. Defendants appealed from a decision of the court in the form of an order, the character of which will sufficiently appear from the opinion. Plaintiff moved to dismiss the appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtOetoh, J.
This cause was pending in the county court of Milwaukee county, and at issue upon complaint and answer, and the appellants had given notice to the respondent, under sec. 55, ch. 137, E. S., and its amendments, to appear and he examined before Edward M. Hunter, Esq., a court commissioner of Milwaukee county, and the respondent did so appear; and, while being- examined, certain questions were propounded to him by the appellants’ counsel, which were objected to by the counsel of the respondent on the ground of their irrelevancy, and the respondent refused to answer the same, and they remained…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sturm v. . Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Noonan v. OrtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- In re RemingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- Johannes v. YoungsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Parsons v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Lanning v. LonsdaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Kelly v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Cleveland v. BurnhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Phipps v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Citizens National Bank v. AlexanderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.