Legal Opinion

Appeal of Hypertherm, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 18, 2005No. 2004-254PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.

The petitioner, Hypertherm, Inc., appeals a decision of the New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board (board) that it is obligated by RSA 281-A:23 (Supp. 2004) to pay medical costs associated with the treatment of a cumulative trauma injury suffered by the respondent, Hyvis Thatcher. We vacate and remand.

The facts relevant to this appeal are undisputed. In February 2001, after voluntarily leaving her job as a nanny, the respondent began working for the petitioner as an order filler and warehouse packer, a position that required her to locate and select ordered pieces for packing. The pieces…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Appeal of BriggsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  2. Claim of Ryciak v. Eastern Precision ResistorNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Appeal of CNA InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  4. In re FaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  5. In re WeaverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Appeal of MalouinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  2. Appeal of MalouinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API