Legal Opinion

Gaddis v. Junker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 25, 1930No. 1943Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

2Per curiam

On rehearing appellants complain that we overruled without discussion their eighth and tenth propositions under subdivision (b) of their brief, which are as follows:

“Eighth Proposition.
“The trial court was in error in definition in the charge as to ‘possession,’ wherein the jury were told: ‘A possession by one who holds in recognition of the title of another is in law the possession of such other person.’ ”
“Tenth Proposition.
“It was error in the trial judge to refuse Appellants’ Requested Charge No. 7 to the effect that no limitation could run in behalf of defendants during the…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gulf, Texas & Western Railway Co. v. DickeyTexas Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Isbell v. LennoxTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Richardson v. Washington & Costley Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Cobb v. RobertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API