Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Rushton (In Re Armstrong)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 24, 2003No. BAP No. UT-02-007. Bankruptcy No. 00B-26592PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION
MCFEELEY, Chief Judge.
The matter before the Court is the Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s May 9, 2003 Opinion (“Motion”), filed May 19, 2003, by the Appellant. The Motion is opposed by both Appellees. The Appellant has filed replies' to the Appellees’ responses. The Court has reviewed the pleadings and applicable case law and determines that the Motion should be denied.
Neither Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8015 nor Rule 8015-1 of this Court’s Local Rules states the substantive requirements for motions for reconsideration. However, when those Federal and…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Armstrong v. Rushton (In Re Armstrong)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- EXTRA EQUIPAMENTOS E EXPORTAÇÃO LTDA. v. CASE CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Bank of Cushing v. Vaughan (In Re Vaughan)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- In Re Frascella Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- In re Mangia Pizza Investments, LPUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.