Legal Opinion
Bank of Cushing v. Vaughan (In Re Vaughan)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 7, 2004No. BAP No. WO-03-094. Bankruptcy No. 99-17361-NLJPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Appellant in this case obtained a partial summary judgment against the Debtors, determining that its debt was nondischargeable under Section 523(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code. 2 It then obtained relief from stay to collect on the judgment and recorded a lien on the Debtors’ homestead. The Debtors in turn filed a Section 522(f) motion to avoid the Appellant’s lien, which the bankruptcy court granted. The Appellant contends that the bankruptcy court erred when it allowed the Debtors to utilize Section 522(f) to avoid its lien and, among other things, has asked…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Cohen v. De La CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ohio v. KovacsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Farrey v. SanderfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In The Matter Of M. Frenville Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Andersen v. UNIPAC-NEBHELP (In Re Andersen)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Alexander v. Hardeman (In Re Alexander)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Eastman National Bank v. Sun 'N Fun Waterpark LLC (In Re Sun 'N Fun Waterpark LLC)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- In re BellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- In re MillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- In Re WenzelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.