Legal Opinion

Terminal Freezing & Heating Co. v. Whitelock

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 10, 1913PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City (.Stump, J.). The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

This ajipeal is from an order of Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City overruling exceptions to the allowance by the auditor’s account of a fee of $5,000.00 to the appellees and latifying said account to that extent.

The fee was allowed by the auditor, in accordance Avith an order passed by Judge Hablan while presiding in said Court, out of the general fund arising from the sale, under the decree of that Court, of the property of the Baltimore Refrigerating and Heating Company of Baltimore City, and the grounds of the exceptions to said allowance are, first, that it Avas not a proper allowance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Henry G. Davis & Co. v. GemmellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  2. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. BurdetteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  3. Wilson v. KellySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889
  4. Spedden v. Baltimore Refrigerating & Heating Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1912

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Platt v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. Hess Construction Co. v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Woodstock College v. HankeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  4. Garcia v. Foulger Pratt Development, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. County Corporation v. SemmesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API