Legal Opinion
DAVIS v. YATES
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 3, 2020No. 2:15-cv-06943Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DARRYL DAVIS, et al., : Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 15-6943 (KM) (JBC) 7 : SHERRY YATES, et al., OPINION Respondents. : KEVIN MCNULTY, U.S.D.J. I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs, Darryl] Davis and Steven Grohs, are civilly committed persons currently residing at the Special Treatment Unit (“STU”) in Avenel, New Jersey. They are proceeding pra se with an amended civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (DE 31.) Presently pending before this Court is the motion of defendants Sherry Yates and Sarah Davis for summary judgment. (DE 113.)…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.