Legal Opinion

Hayden v. Bruno's, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 18, 1991No. 1901339PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Henry Hayden filed an action pursuant to Ala. Code 1975, §25-5-11.1 against Bruno's, Inc., alleging that his employment with Bruno's had been terminated in retaliation for his having filed a workmen's compensation claim against Bruno's. The case was tried before the trial court without a jury, and at the end of Hayden's evidence, the trial court granted Bruno's Rule 41(b), A.R.Civ.P., motion for involuntary dismissal. Hayden appeals.

Rule 41(b), A.R.Civ.P. provides:

"After the plaintiff, in an action tried by the court without a jury, has completed the presentation of his evidence, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Feaster v. American Liberty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Conner v. City of DothanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Continental Eagle Corp. v. MokrzyckiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Alabama Power Co. v. AldridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. AMERICAN PETROLEUM EQUIP. AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. FancherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Dunlop Tire Corp. v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Hess v. Clarcor, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API