Legal Opinion

American Rolling Mill Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 15, 1926No. C-460PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Judge

The plaintiff is seeking to recover on two causes of action growing out of separate transactions. The first cause of action is based upon an alleged informal contract. The plaintiff had two contracts with defendant — one for the manufacture of 500,000 thick-wall and the other for 750,000 thin-wall shell body forgings. These contracts were performed and plaintiff was paid the contract price in each case.

The matter in controversy is a claim to the effect that it was agreed to increase the order for 750,000 forgings to a *893million, and that, relying upon this agreement plaintiff purchased certain…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Willard, Sutherland & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Charles Nelson Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. North Star Chemical Works v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  2. Purity Cross v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API