Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Austin
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 12, 2003No. CIV.A. 99-3363-KHVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NUNC PRO TUNC MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought suit against defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that they violated his constitutional rights by denying him adequate medical care and through use of excessive force. On January 17, 2003, the Court awarded plaintiff actual damages of $15,000 and punitive damages of $30,000. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Application For Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. # 157) filed February 27, 2003. Plaintiff seeks fees of $69,425.50 and expenses of $9,934.26. For reasons stated below, the Court sustains plaintiffs…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Case v. Unified School District No. 233Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Kelli Lyn Metz, and v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boesing v. SpiessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Hall v. TerrellDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2009
- Farella v. HockadayDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2004
- Hightower v. Nassau County Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Wood v. Panton & Co. Realty, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.