Legal Opinion
Farella v. Hockaday
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided January 16, 2004No. 3:00-cv-03021PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McCUSKEY, District Judge.
A jury trial was held March 17, 2003, on Plaintiffs claim that the defendants used excessive force against him in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights, during his incarceration at Logan Correctional Center. On March 19, 2003, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Defendant Hockaday and against Defendant Skelton in the amount of $1,000. This court denied Defendant Skelton’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or in the Alternative for New Trial on April 23, 2003 (# 116), and the case is now on appeal.
Before the court is Plaintiffs Revised Bill of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Searles v. Van BebberCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Harry D. Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Samsung America, Incorporated, an Illinois Corporation, Samsung Shipbuilding & Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Harry D. Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Formerly Known as Samsung Shipbuilding and Heavy Industries Company, Limited, a Republic of Korea Corporation, Samsung America, Incorporated, and Samsung Construction Equipment Company, a Division of Samsung America, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boesing v. SpiessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Craig Boesing v. Lt. Joe SpiessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Surprenant v. Rivas, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2004