Legal Opinion
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania Insurance Company v. Richard Findley Denikan Brewer Desirie Brewer Dane Flores Delesa Flores Javier Cortez, and Blanca Montes-Harris Monica Arredondo Camilla Toni Harris, Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania Insurance Company v. Richard Findley Denikan Brewer Desirie Brewer Dane Flores Delesa Flores Blanca Montes-Harris Monica Arredondo Camilla Toni Harris, and Javier Cortez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 13, 2005No. 03-56651PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
395 F.3d 1046
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Richard FINDLEY; Denikan Brewer; Desirie Brewer; Dane Flores; Delesa Flores; Javier Cortez, Defendants, and
Blanca Montes-Harris; Monica Arredondo; Camilla Toni Harris, Defendants-Appellants.
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Richard Findley; Denikan Brewer; Desirie Brewer; Dane Flores; Delesa Flores; Blanca Montes-Harris; Monica Arredondo; Camilla Toni Harris, Defendants, and
Javier Cortez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-56651.
No…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barrera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Kremen v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- American Continental Insurance v. C & Z Timber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Anacker v. SillasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Hertz Corp. v. Home InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. FindleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007