Probate Court of Central Falls v. Adams
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Debt on Bond. Heard on demurrer to defendants’ pleas, and demurrer sustained.
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, C. J.
This action is brought upon the bond referred tó in Adams v. Probate Court, 26 R. I. 239. To the declaration the defendants filed, besides the- plea of non est factum, six special pleas, to which the plaintiff has demurred.(1) The second plea claims the benefit of section 24 of chapter 218 of the General Laws, and avers that in this action there is no suggestion of waste.
The obvious answer to this plea is that this is not an action to recover a debt of the testator or a legacy under his will, but the penalty of a bond given as an independent obligation by the defendants. The statute cited…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. HodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- United States v. MoraSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Speck v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
- Whitted v. GovernorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1838
- DeLashmutt v. SellwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fairmont Cement Stone Manufacturing Co. v. DavisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913