Legal Opinion

DeLashmutt v. Sellwood

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah County.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Watson, J.:

On motion to dismiss for defects in appeal papers, and on the further ground that none of the errors assigned in the notices of appeal appear from the transcript on file; LI eld,

1st. That only the first mentioned grounds of dismissal can be considered under the established practice of the court.

2d. That where no affidavits showing qualifications of sureties on the undertaking for appeal, were filed with it, a cross motion for leave to file a new undertaking, with such *52affidavits supplied, without alleging or showing any mistake excusing such omission in reference to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Mahoney v. McKinmoreOregon Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mendenhall v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Newbbrg Orchard Ass'n v. OsbornOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Probate Court of Central Falls v. AdamsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1905
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. Consolidated Indemnity & InsuranceHocking County Court of Common Pleas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API