Legal Opinion

United States v. Mora

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 18, 1878No. 301PublishedCited by 15 opinions

ERROR-to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This is a suit by the United States on a bond dated and executed March 4,1863, exacted by the collector of the port of New York, as a condition precedent to granting a clearance to the vessel “ Sarah Marsh,” laden with a cargo of merchandise, bound to the port of -Matamoras, in Mexico.

Read the full summary

ERROR-to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This is a suit by the United States on a bond dated and executed March 4,1863, exacted by the collector of the port of New York, as a condition precedent to granting a clearance to the vessel “ Sarah Marsh,” laden with a cargo of merchandise, bound to the port of -Matamoras, in Mexico. To support the issues on its part, the plaintiff proved that on the twenty-third day of May, 1862, the then Secretary of the Treasury had instructed the then collector of customs at the port of New York as follows: —…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bradley

We think the judgment in this case should be reversed. The objection that the bond does not correspond with the form prescribed by the second section of the act of May 20, 1862 (12 Stat. 404), does not meet the case. It is supported by the third section, if not by the second, in connection with the treasury circular issued under it May 23, 1862.

To understand the force of the objection and the answer to it, it is necessary to look at the general scope of the act.

The first section authorized the Secretary of the Treasury to refuse a clearance to any vessel or other vehicle laden with goods…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. HodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. The United States, in Error v. Phineas Bradley, Surviving Administrator of David Ott DeceasedSupreme Court of the United States · 1836

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Piper v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1910
  3. Pacific Hardware & Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1914
  4. Eagle Indemnity Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  5. Montgomery County v. Phoenix InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API