Flamm v. Noble
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The jury could find on the evidence that defendant designed the bringing of such psychological pressure to bear on plaintiff as to induce him, against his will, to sell radio station WMCA to defendant at defendant’s price, and that defendant carefully selected the tools whereby the design was successfully executed, all amounting to duress upon plaintiff. On the other hand, the jury might have found that the radio' station was on the market, that the price defendant paid was fair and one at which plaintiff was willing to sell, and that *1038plaintiff, advised by competent counsel, was not subject…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Galbraith v. BuschNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Bleecker v. . JohnstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Milio v. Railway Motor Trucking Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Perlman v. ShanckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Schwier v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hutchinson v. ShaheenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Weil v. WeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Kern v. News Syndicate Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Renault, Inc. v. Auto Imports, Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1963
- Mahoney v. StaffaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.