Legal Opinion
Renault, Inc. v. Auto Imports, Ltd.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSaypol, J.
Motion is denied. The parties here are also contending in the Federal court. Here the action is by Renault for over $200,000 arising from breach of contract. In the Federal court the action is in tort, by the defendants here, as plaintiffs there, suing for the wrongful appropriation of their sales franchise from Renault. The Federal action was started on January 13, 1961, and this action was then brought about 10 days later. Just a year ago, plaintiff’s counsel gave notice to defendants’ counsel that Busby and Rivkin of Renault’s lawyers anticipated appearing as witnesses, that a new member…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cherry Creek National Bank v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Erwin M. Jennings Co. v. DiGenovaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Robinson v. DauchyNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- French v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Miller v. UrbanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. BaldiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Wolk v. WolkNew York Supreme Court · 1972