Legal Opinion

Smalley v. Hale

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1865PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to St. Louis Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, Judge

This was a suit upon promissory notes. The defence relied upon on the trial was that the notes had been obtained by fraud and misrepresentation. The instructions which were given on either side placed the case before the jury on this defence alone. The evidence furnished an ample basis for such instructions. On the part of the defendant the jury was told in effect that if the payee obtained the notes from the defendant by means of false representations which induced him to execute the notes, or by knowingly concealing material and substantial facts, unknown to the defendant, which, if they…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McAdams v. CatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
  2. Barron v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  3. Buford v. ByrdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1843
  4. Casey v. SmalesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1835

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Niles v. DanforthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. Clough v. HoldenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Reynolds v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  4. Weinstein v. ReidMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. Leedom v. Earls Furniture & Carpet Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API