Barron v. Alexander
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtScott, Judge
The defendant sets up in his answer to the plaintiff’s petition, which is founded on a note given for the price of a slave, *531that at tlve time of the sale the slave was diseased, which was known to the plaintiff and which he fraudulently concealed from him.
Where a vendor sells a defective article, knowing the existence of the defect, for a sound price, and does not disclose it to his vendee, he is guilty of a fraud, and such fraud may be set up as a defence to an action founded on a note given for the price of the article. In such case it is not necessary to the defence that there should be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McAdams v. CatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grigsby v. StapletonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Puls v. Hornbeck Et UxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Smalley v. HaleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
- Cecil v. SpurgerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
- Gottschalk v. KircherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891