Hodges v. Planters & Peoples Mutual Fire Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. Of two inconsistent clauses appearing in the body of an 'insurance policy, the one more favorable to the insured will be adopted. Where a clause in a policy of fire insurance provides that “if, at any time, there shall be a change of title or ownership of the within described property, the obligation of the insured and the asso*204ciation shall cease,” and another clause further on in the policy provides that if the insured “shall mortgage or deed his . . property to secure a debt or to obtain money, the said policy shall be cancelled by the president of this association unless the secretary…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Union Brokerage Co. v. Beall Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Parker v. Southern Ruralist Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Strauss Bros. v. PearlmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
3Cited by7 opinions
- Davis v. United American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Genone v. Citizens Ins. Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Ætna Life Insurance v. PadgettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Canal Insurance Co. v. TateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Canal Insurance Co. v. TateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.