Scariano v. JUSTICES OF S. CT. OF STATE OF IND.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
BARKER, Chief Judge.
Introduction
States have a constitutionally permissible and substantial interest in regulating bar admission. In re Griffiths, 413 U.S. 717, 723, 93 S.Ct. 2851, 2855-56, 37 L.Ed.2d 910 (1973). The Supreme Court has recognized “the traditional authority of state courts to control who may be admitted to practice before them,” Leis v. Flynt, 439 U.S. 438, 444 n. 5, 99 S.Ct. 698, 701-02 n. 5, 58 L.Ed.2d 717 (1979) and “their broad power to establish standards for licensing practitioners and regulating the practice…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anthony G. Scariano v. Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana and Members of the State Board of Law Examiners of the State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Johnson v. State of Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Feliciano v. Tribunal Supremo De Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999