Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Cortland City School District
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 21, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert G. Hurlbutt, J.
Petitioners in this CPLR article 78 proceeding were em*8ployed by Onondaga-Cortland-Madison Board of Cooperative Educational Services (hereinafter OCM BOCES) as certified teaching assistants. Respondent school districts contracted with OCM BOCES to provide special education programs. In the spring of 1989, each of the three respondent school districts discontinued their contracts with OCM BOCES and undertook to provide their own special educational programs for the 1989-1990 school year. As a result of the takeover of these programs by the respondent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. Board of Education of the East Ramapo Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Buenzow v. Lewiston-Porter Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Matter of Buenzow v. Lewiston-Porter Cent. Sch. Dist.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- Anderson v. Cortland City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Kranson v. Madison-Oneida Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesNew York Supreme Court · 2001
- Madison-Oneida Board of Cooperative Educational Services v. MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Robinson v. BruniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Fink v. Avon Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994