Legal Opinion

Matter of Buenzow v. Lewiston-Porter Cent. Sch. Dist.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Stewart F. Hancock, Jr. We add only that a literal application of section 3014-b of the Education Law — advocated by neither party to this appeal — could have anomalous and, we believe, unintended consequences, for example, the automatic transfer of senior BOCES teachers, against their wish, to school districts where no positions are available, even where their BOCES positions remain available. Clarification by the Legislature could help avoid…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Acinapuro v. Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Cortland City School DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bojarczuk v. MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Herrman v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API