Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Cortland City School District
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 8, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We agree for the reasons stated in the decision of Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Hurlbutt, J.), that the position of teaching assistant is not included within the meaning of the word "teacher” as used in Education Law § 3014-b. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hurlbutt, J.— Article 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Lowery and Davis, JJ. [See, 147 Misc 2d 7.]
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Anderson v. Cortland City School DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1990
3Cited by4 opinions
- Madison-Oneida Board of Cooperative Educational Services v. MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Putnam Northern Westchester Board of Cooperative Educational Services v. MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Robinson v. BruniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Fink v. Avon Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994