Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Washington Mutual Bank

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2010No. 2009-0441Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Cleveland v. Washington Mut. Bank, 125 Ohio St.3d 541,

2010-Ohio-2219.] CITY OF CLEVELAND, APPELLANT, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, APPELLEE. [Cite as Cleveland v. Washington Mut. Bank, 125 Ohio St.3d 541,

2010-Ohio-2219.] Criminal law — R. C. 2941.47 does not authorize a trial of a corporation in absentia in a criminal proceeding that is initiated by affidavit or complaint in a municipal court. (No. 2009-0441 ⎯ Submitted December 2, 2009 ⎯ Decided May 26, 2010.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 91379,

2008-Ohio-6956. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT R.C.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. City of Cleveland v. Washington Mutual BankOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. GundlachOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. City of Cleveland v. Washington Mutual BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. City of Lima v. WardOhio Court of Appeals · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API