Legal Opinion

Kessler v. Frost

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 9, 1918No. 21,670PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Woodson,district court; Oscar Foust, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

A bank in which the defendant Frost had deposited certain money was garnished in actions to recover on certain promissory notes. The garnishments were discharged on the ground that the money was exempt, and the 'plaintiffs appeal.

The defendant asserts the exempt character of the fund because borrowed for the purpose of paying for improvements on his homestead. His evidence, in substance, was that he with his family had occupied' his farm as a homestead for about eighteen years; that about June, 1917, he made a loan thereon for $6,000, paid off…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDermott v. HalleckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Smith v. GoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  3. Milberger v. VeselskySupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Berry v. DeweySupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Brenneke v. DuigenanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Achenbach v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Federal Land Bank v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Jenkins v. HodesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  4. In Re HodesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1999
  5. Weber v. WeberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API