Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Curry Grocery Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 1, 1916No. 7105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Valdosta — Judge Cranford. October 29, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, J.

1. The business was conducted in the name of “Oscar Roberta &' Co.,” not only without objection from Oscar Roberts, but with his full knowledge and consent; credit was asked for and obtained from the plaintiff in the name of the firm, on the faith of the membership of Oscar Roberts in the firm, and the evidence authorized the inference that he connived at the use of his name for this purpose. “An ostensible partner is one whose name appears to the world as such, and he is bound, though he have no interest in the firm.” Civil Code, § 3157.

2. “Prima facie, the execution of a negotiable note in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haskins v. Throne, Franklin & AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Griffin v. Colonial BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clarke v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  2. Brandt v. EckmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Girtman v. Tanner-Brice Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API