Legal Opinion

Haskins v. Throne, Franklin & Adams

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 7, 1897PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Complaint on notes. Before Judge Janes. Polk superior court. February term, 1896.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

Throne, Franklin & Adams brought suit against Ellis Davis & Company, a mining partnership, composed of Ellis Davis and C. R. Haskins, upon two promissory notes signed in the firm name, and payable to Jones & Whitehead or bearer. Plaintiffs alleged that they were holders for value before maturity, without notice of any defect or defense. The defendant Haskins pleaded, that he was a member of the defend*127ant firm, which was a partnership engaged in the business of quarrying and selling slate; that Davis, the other member of the firm, under the partnership contract, had no authority to give any…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harris & Mitchell v. McArthurSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Selman v. Brown, Nunnally & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1886

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Taylor v. ReeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Great Southern Accident & Fidelity Co. v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. Griffin v. Colonial BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Maynard v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API