Legal Opinion
Jewell v. Bestbus Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 3, 2018No. Case No. 1:18-cv-00359 (TNM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TREVOR N. MCFADDEN, U.S.D.J.
Vasily Jewell seeks to sue DC2NY Incorporated for alleged violations of state and federal labor laws, civil rights laws, breach of contract, and negligence. DC2NY has moved to quash service and dismiss the Plaintiff's complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(4) and 12(b)(5). I find that Mr. Jewell failed to serve DC2NY in violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (" Rule 4"), and that he failed to use the Defendant's correct legal name in the complaint caption as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a) (" Rule 10"). However, he has shown good cause for the insufficient service of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dennis C. Barsten v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Canuto v. CarterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Raynor v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Bobby Battle, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Park Anderson, and Simon Toppah, Applicant-In-Intervention-Appellant. Bobby Battle, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Park Anderson, and His Successor, and Jean L'aquarius, Applicant-In-Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
3Cited by2 opinions
- Myeress v. Proam Dance Team Nyc LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Smith v. HambroDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2020