Legal Opinion
Jewell v. Bestbus
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 3, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2018-0359Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VASILY JEWELL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:18-cv-00359 (TNM) BESTBUS COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER Vasily Jewell seeks to sue DC2NY Incorporated for alleged violations of state and federal labor laws, civil rights laws, breach of contract, and negligence. DC2NY has moved to quash service and dismiss the Plaintiff’s complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(4) and 12(b)(5). I find that Mr. Jewell failed to serve DC2NY in violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (“Rule 4”), and that he failed to use the Defendant’s correct legal name in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dennis C. Barsten v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Canuto v. CarterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Raynor v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Bobby Battle, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Park Anderson, and Simon Toppah, Applicant-In-Intervention-Appellant. Bobby Battle, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Park Anderson, and His Successor, and Jean L'aquarius, Applicant-In-Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993