Legal Opinion

Swartz v. Sanders

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 29, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPuryear, J.

This is a suit on an oral sales contract. In addition to referring to the parties herein by name, we will also refer to them as complainant and defendant as they were designated in the trial Court.

Complainant, H. R. Sanders, d/b/a Beasley Amusement Company, filed his original bill in Chancery Court alleging, in substance, that on February 12, 1962, he purchased from defendant several amusement machines located in eight retail establishments and also a truck and some unexpired privilege licenses, for the sum of $14,500.00; that as part of the consideration for such purchase, the defendant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morristown Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Lotspeich Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  2. Hagan v. Nashville Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Capshaw v. Town of CookervilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Kittrelle v. Philsar Development Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962
  5. Galloway v. DunningtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McClain v. Kimbrough Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  2. Tire Shredders, Inc. v. ERM-North Central, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  3. Tire Shredders v. ERMCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API