Legal Opinion

Peter v. Gill

Superior Court of Guam

Decided August 13, 2019No. CV0426-18Unknown

1Opinion of the Court

I, . 11:02 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Of GUAM B - JOSHUA F. PETER, ET AL., Superior Court Case No. CV0426-1$ Plaintiffs, DECISION AND ORDER vs. RE tTHIRD] MOTION TO FRANCIS GILL, ET DISQUALIFY WAYSON WONG AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF S Defendants. The Court here considers Defendants Cyfred, Ltd. ‘s and Stephanie Mendiola’s (third) Motion to Disqualify Wayson Wong as Counsel for Plaintiffs. Having considered the parties’ arguments and the applicable rules of professional conduct, the Court DENIES the Motion contingent on Wong proving certain clients have provided informed consent to his continued…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Celanese Corporation and Fiber Industries, Inc. v. Leesona Corporation, Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. Red Rooster Construction Co. v. River Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. United States v. StonehillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API