Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Hill

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1948No. Civ. 16274PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Defendants have appealed from a judgment against them after trial before the court without a jury in an action to quiet title to certain trucks and trailers and for declaratory relief.

Defendant Hill operated a trucking business in Los Angeles. In May, 1946, he advertised in a newspaper substantially as follows: “Bobtails plus five year contract permanent, better than wages. Hill Transportation, 8022 Beach Street. ’ ’ In response to the advertisement plaintiff visited defendant Hill’s place of business and purchased two trucks or “tractors” and two trailers. The transaction was evidenced by a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Armour & Co. of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
  2. Brown v. Banana Distributors of Connecticut, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1943
  3. Walker v. BaileyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Levitt v. Glen L. Clark & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Shiya v. RevieaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API