Pearson v. Hill
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
Defendants have appealed from a judgment against them after trial before the court without a jury in an action to quiet title to certain trucks and trailers and for declaratory relief.
Defendant Hill operated a trucking business in Los Angeles. In May, 1946, he advertised in a newspaper substantially as follows: “Bobtails plus five year contract permanent, better than wages. Hill Transportation, 8022 Beach Street. ’ ’ In response to the advertisement plaintiff visited defendant Hill’s place of business and purchased two trucks or “tractors” and two trailers. The transaction was evidenced by a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Armour & Co. of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
- Brown v. Banana Distributors of Connecticut, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1943
- Walker v. BaileyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
3Cited by2 opinions
- Levitt v. Glen L. Clark & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Shiya v. RevieaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953