Legal Opinion
Feder v. Caliguira
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 30, 1960PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.
In September of 1955, the defendant Caliguira, operating a pizzeria and restaurant in Brooklyn, entered into a written contract with the plaintiff Feder providing for the installation in his premises of an automatic coin-operated phonograph, a juke box, “ for the duration of [the] agreement and any renewal term thereof ”. The agreement provided for the parties to share the gross proceeds of the machine’s operation, placing the proprietor under no financial burden, his only obligation being to keep the juke box connected to an electric outlet on the premises, ‘ ‘ in readiness for operation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. . RichardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Matter of N.Y. World-Telegram Corp. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Wash-O-Matic Laundry Co. v. 621 Lefferts Avenue Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
- Kaypar Corp. v. Fosterport Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1947
- Halpern v. SilverCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- American Jewish Theatre, Inc. v. Roundabout Theatre Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Hotel Syracuse Inc. v. City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency (In Re Hotel Syracuse Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1993
- Dubay v. Trans-America InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Davis v. DinkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Union Square Park Community Coalition, Inc. v. New York City Department of Parks & RecreationNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.