Aero Construction Co. v. Grizzard

We find no error in the rulings of the court on the demurrers. The first demurrer was properly overruled, certainly after the petition had been amended. Since the petition was amended about twenty days before that ruling, we think it inferable that the court was cognizant of the amendment when the ruling was made. The petition as amended stated' a cause of action as against a general demurrer, and the ruling on the second demurrer was right regardless of the reason which the court may have given for making it. See Bank of Norwood v. Chapman, 19 Ga. App. 709 (92 S. E. 225); Blount v. King, 51…