Legal Opinion
United States v. Riley Harrington Keller, Iii, Millard Lee Smith, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 2, 1990No. 89-8623PublishedCited by 152 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COX, Circuit Judge:
Defendants, Riley Harrington Keller III, and Millard Lee Smith Jr., appeal their convictions for armed bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), conspiracy to commit armed bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 371, and use of a firearm during an armed bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). 1 Keller and Smith also appeal the sentences imposed by the district court under the Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm Smith’s convictions and sentences, and affirm in part and reverse in part Keller’s convictions and sentences.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. The Indictment
Keller’s and Smith’s convictions…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Tyrone Gaither v. United States of America, Charles Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Terence George KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by152 opinions
- United States v. Daniel J. LeichtnamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Hernan Francisco Perez-Tosta, Gustavo Javier Correa-Patino, Erasmo Perez-Aguilera, Luis Guillermo Rojas-ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Glennis L. Bolden, United States of America v. Clifford E. BoldenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John E. CALHOON, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.