Legal Opinion
United Ass'n of Journeymen v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 23, 1995No. A062708PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEIN, J.
The City and County of San Francisco (hereinafter the City) 1 appeals an order issuing a writ of mandate compelling the City to pay certain of its employees the difference between the salary they received in the fiscal year 1991-1992, and the salary they would have received pursuant to the 1991-1992 salary standardization ordinance, had it not been vetoed by the Mayor. The trial court found that the Board had a mandatory duty to pass the ordinance and override the Mayor’s veto.
The City’s appeal raises an issue of first impression: does the Board have the discretion to defer…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- DeYoung v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Collins v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- City & County of San Francisco v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Walker v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- County of Del Norte v. City of Crescent CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Woo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Transdyn/Cresci JV v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- City of San Diego v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Don't Cell Our Parks v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.