Legal Opinion
Cruickshank v. Commerce Insurance
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided June 28, 2004PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.
This is a Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8C, appeal of the entry of summary judgment for the defendant-insurer3 on the plaintiffs claims for (1) G.L.c. 90, §34M Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) payments for the unpaid balance of allegedly necessary and reasonable charges for the chiropractic treatment of the defendant’s insured, and (2) G.L.c. 93A damages for the defendant’s alleged unfair insurance practices in failing to make full PIP payments in violation of G.L.c. 176D.4
1. The plaintiff contends that the motion judge erred by failing to apply the proper summary judgment standard5 and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- LaLonde v. EissnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Madsen v. ErwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Carter v. SetoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2005
- Provenzano v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
- Amari v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007
- Consumer Product Distributors, Inc. v. ElseidyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
- Oxford Business Brokers, Inc. v. MoriartyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.