Hankins v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMiller, Judge
Today the majority dispenses with the necessity of instructing the jury on the law of circumstantial evidence, a Texas legal tradition over a hundred years old, and yet continues the prohibition against instructing the jury on a definition of reasonable doubt, a Texas legal tradition over a hundred years old. The logic for the latter is cursorily explained in a footnote purporting to distinguish the Holland decision. Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121, 75 S.Ct. 127, 99 L.Ed. 150 (1954). The majority concludes in that footnote that Holland followed a local practice of giving an elaborate…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited125 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- State v. AddingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Ex Parte McWilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Miles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- United States v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.