Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Thomas

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 22, 1922No. 6 Div. 709PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals in the case of Thomas v. State, 93 South. 237.

The motion for new trial was based upon the insistence that the verdict was contrary t(j the evidence, and that the proof was insufficient to support the verdict. As to this motion the bill of exceptions shows no exception to any ruling thereon, nor does-it contain any reference thereto, and was properly not considered (Powell v. Folmar [Ala. Sup.] 78 South. 47); 1 but no necessity arose in this case for the introduction of evidence upon motion for new trial, or that the bill of exceptions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Powell v. FolmarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. National Pyrites & Copper Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Thomas v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dukes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Mickle v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Campbell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Tanner v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Cornelius v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API