Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1922No. 6 Div. 70. [fn*]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerritt, J.

The defendant was convicted under an indictment which charged robbery, and was sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of 10 years.

The defendant made a motion for a new trial, but this motion, appearing in the record proper, and not in the bill of exceptions, and there being no statement in the bill of exceptions as to what, if any, testimony was offered in connection with the motion for a new trial, cannot be considered. Acts 1915, p. 722; Crawley v. State, 16 Ala. App. 545, 79 South. 804; Stover v. State, 204 Ala. 311, 85 South. 393.

By motion in arrest of judgment the appellant raised the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pippin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Stover v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Crawley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Watkins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Thomas v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API