Legal Opinion

Mickle v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 18, 1933No. 5 Div. 139PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

This is defendant’s second appeal from a conviction of rape. Mickle v. State (Ala. App.) 142 So. 120.

The testimony of the witness Charlie Foster as to what was said by the prosecutrix when he went to her house, in response to her summons, was but the remainder of a conversation, a part of which defendant had himself previously elicited, and its admission was without error. Allen v. State, 134 Ala. 159, 32 So. 318; Catts v. Phillips, 217 Ala. 488, 117 So. 34.

Moreover, we conclude the defendant’s objection to the evidence is based upon the erroneous assumption that what…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. American Ry. Express Co. v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Catts v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  5. Pearce v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kelley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Albarran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  4. Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API